One allegation is that Wynn Resorts was buying land in Everett for its casino despite some of the sellers having a criminal past. The evidence that Judge Saris did accept has merit involves a couple of different aspects of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. In this particular case, this relates to Wynn Resorts “petitioning” for (and subsequently receiving) a casino license from the Massachusetts Gaming Commission for Encore Boston Harbor. However, Judge Saris also noted that Wynn Resorts could aim to block such a suit due to state law that prevents certain types of lawsuits from being filed against a party exercising its 1st Amendment right for petitioning the government. Judge Saris did note when dismissing the suit that Sterling Suffolk could roll the dice in the state court in order to try and obtain damages of over $1bn. However, US District Court Judge Patti Saris tossed the case out due to lack of evidence.Ĭould roll the dice in the state court in order to try and obtain damages of over $1bn They gave evidence to the court alleging potential wrongdoing by Wynn Resorts. The lawsuit had been filed by Sterling Suffolk, the owner of the Suffolk Downs racetrack until 2017. A federal judge has ruled that there was not enough evidence of racketeering in a case brought against Wynn Resorts.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |